amelius 6 hours ago Why didn't they mention threads? bartvk 4 hours ago Oh gosh, that's interesting. I bet that complicates using using errno. Or is errno somehow copied into a local variable? Vogtinator 3 hours ago errno is in thread-local storage (TLS) amelius 3 hours ago Yes. It is too bad that they didn't use a similar solution for the current working directory. Chdir() is process-wide, not thread local :(
bartvk 4 hours ago Oh gosh, that's interesting. I bet that complicates using using errno. Or is errno somehow copied into a local variable? Vogtinator 3 hours ago errno is in thread-local storage (TLS) amelius 3 hours ago Yes. It is too bad that they didn't use a similar solution for the current working directory. Chdir() is process-wide, not thread local :(
Vogtinator 3 hours ago errno is in thread-local storage (TLS) amelius 3 hours ago Yes. It is too bad that they didn't use a similar solution for the current working directory. Chdir() is process-wide, not thread local :(
amelius 3 hours ago Yes. It is too bad that they didn't use a similar solution for the current working directory. Chdir() is process-wide, not thread local :(
Why didn't they mention threads?
Oh gosh, that's interesting. I bet that complicates using using errno. Or is errno somehow copied into a local variable?
errno is in thread-local storage (TLS)
Yes. It is too bad that they didn't use a similar solution for the current working directory. Chdir() is process-wide, not thread local :(