Havoc 3 hours ago

Really seems like an omnibus of all things terrible type of bill. The fact that they got >50% to vote for what is so obviously rotten is wild

stuaxo 4 hours ago

What companies were the lobbies who asked for this working for, they should named and the companies vilified.

mike_hearn 4 hours ago

[flagged]

  • neilalexander 4 hours ago

    > WiFi is obsolete tech. Even 5Ghz WiFi often barely works, let alone 6GHz (which no Apple device supports)

    Sorry, _what_? This is an absurdly ludicrous take. Wi-Fi is one of the most successful and ubiquitous wireless technologies of all time. 5GHz has been working fine for people (especially in locations where 2.4GHz is crowded) for I don't know how many years—at least over a decade, or even two if you count 802.11a. Most Apple devices from the last 2 years support 6GHz too.

  • justinphelps 4 hours ago

    "The best thing governments can do to help people in these places is allocate as much spectrum as possible to the carriers. WiFi is obsolete tech. Even 5Ghz WiFi often barely works, let alone 6GHz"

    I think that the billions of people that use WiFi every day for free would disagree.

  • soganess 2 hours ago

      > no means testing (so not for "poor rural kids")
    
    I pay ~70$ for symmetric gigabit. But, honestly, I would gladly have a kid, move, and then send my kid to underfunded public school in rural Texas... just to be able to con the government out of ~5$ worth of super slow public wifi. Totally worth it!

    Means testing is a joke in cases like this. It's just a way for state and local governments to embezzle money from programs meant to help kids.