evaneykelen 7 hours ago

Cool viz! The demo shows the channel forming gradually but iirc there's actually evidence it happened super fast - like a giant lake in Doggerland had a dam that broke and "fast flushed" to carve the channel in one catastrophic event

mncharity 10 hours ago

Northern winter and summer look very different[1] (and those don't even capture sea ice).

I've puzzled over how to represent such variation. Especially with deeper time paleogeography, where those 100 kyr of ice ages and sea level changes can be the variation which needs to be aggregated.

One approach is sampling biased by similarity. So you snag points in time, from similar times of year and climate states. If the interactive allows twiddling those, it might not be too misleading.

One approach is open-shutter motion blur. The sometimes-there sometimes-not semi-transparent ice sheets.

One approach is, maybe call it flickered multiples. If one was showing a year, the visual could rapidly cycle through the months.

Any others?

Clouds raise similar issues. It's interesting how time-blurred cloud cover changes with seasons and decades and climate.

[1] Jan 2004: https://eoimages.gsfc.nasa.gov/images/imagerecords/74000/742... (2 MB) June: https://eoimages.gsfc.nasa.gov/images/imagerecords/74000/743... from Blue Marble Next Generation https://visibleearth.nasa.gov/collection/1484/blue-marble Much higher resolutions are available there.

  • agnosis 7 hours ago

    Thats an interesting point. I think that if the climate difference is important I would allow the user to toggle between summer and winter. Or choose based on the context if you are showing specific events like wars that were impacted by winter weather. From my research (not professional or scientific) ice sheets didn’t move much between seasons so I wouldn’t include them. When you have very large intervals of 100k years when you go further back there could be several ice ages in between so I don’t think it makes much sense there. In what context do you think that this would be important to consider?

arscan 12 hours ago

Very cool, the interactivity of this makes this a much better learning tool than a set of static images (for me, at least).

One minor suggestion: on mobile put the date scrubber on the bottom, otherwise my thumb gets in the way of the UI while sliding back and forth through time :)

Also, I’m not sure if a log scale for time makes sense in this case. It confused me for a second, at least.

Great job, thanks for sharing!

  • agnosis 7 hours ago

    Thanks for the feedback! I used log scale because it will be easier to show historical events on the timeline once I implement that. Since much more happened closer to present day

  • mncharity 10 hours ago

    Log scales can be educationally confusing. One alternative is a stack of scrubbers of different zooms.

culebron21 9 hours ago

Awesome. I'd suggest implementing lakes that were created by ice sheets blocking rivers in the northern hemisphere (in Canada & Siberia).

  • agnosis 7 hours ago

    Great point, I thought about it but decided it was too hard to do. But I will take another look and see if I can find some good data sources for it.

fillskills 10 hours ago

This is great. Always wanted something exactly like this for teaching or learning History and Geology. For some reason I had a real struggle with history in books format.

bediger4000 14 hours ago

Interesting, but you're missing geologically important proglacial lakes, like Lake Missoula and Lake Agassiz.

dinkblam 9 hours ago

doesn't seem to work on macOS with either Safari or Chrome. am i missing something?

  • hactually 4 hours ago

    Yeah - not rendering on MacOS Chrome or Firefox.

    • LargoLasskhyfv 22 minutes ago

      Current FF on Linux renders OK (on Intel HD Graphics 630 @ 1.10 GHz/Kaby Lake).